(continued from part 1)
Russian children have always known how to stand up to the bad guys!
Cover for international child trade
The enormous scale of international child trade requires complex multilayer criminal cover at various levels of authority, from police officers and social workers to special forces and political lobbies. Journalists Dirk Banze and Mickael Berendt of the German newspaper Die Welt report on a criminal net supplying young children to the pedophilic dens of Belgium and the Netherlands. The article informs on issues beyond child prostitution, as it tells of famous businessmen and prominent government policymakers of various European countries who sexually abuse, torment, and even murder children.
The cases were videotaped and then sold through illegal sources. The investigation attempts of European police yielded no results. Only one sadist Mark Dutra was arrested. As reported by German investigative journalists, the evidence of him being but a part of a large criminal group was ignored by the police. Journalists were able to provide excessive evidence of the investigation being annulled because of the high profile suspects involved.
As we discuss the cover-up of commercial exploitation of children, the newborn trade in China should be mentioned, as well as the sexual abuse and murder of children on camera, and many other cases that are unfortunately -beyond any doubt – just the tip of this criminal iceberg.
Are “baby-boxes” used as a cover-up for child trade?
Once you realize how profitable children as a business can be, you cannot help but wondering about “baby-boxes,” where every fifth child vanishes without a trace, as reported by German authorities.
We are reminded of how the story of “baby-boxes” began:
In the year 2000, SterniPark installed the first “baby-box” in Hamburg, Germany. It seems to be worthy to remind the reader that SterniPark was initially registered as a non-profit organization (Ger. Eingetragener Verin) and in 2002 it was re-registered as an LLC (Ger. GmbH) with the authorized capital of 550,000 euros.
As we reported earlier, German politicians questioned the activity of SterniPark: Ditrih Verzih, Senator of Health and Social Policy, city of Hamburg, suggested that an evaluation was conducted to determine if there was sufficient evidence for a criminal investigation of SterniPark activities, directly implying that SterniPark has possible involvement in child trading.
It would seem that the overwhelming evidence of the total failure of “baby-boxes” in Germany be quite enough to disinterest anyone from their further use. Obviously, the noble aim of “saving the lives of children” is not attainable through the means of anonymous “baby-boxes.” However, in the past couple of years, we witness attempts of “baby-box” introduction in various regions of the Russian Federation over and over again.
What’s especially interesting, these attempts have a very strong German connection. See for yourself.
In July of 2013, the website of The German Bundesrat informs about the 12th meeting of German and Russian legislators, the friendship groups of The German Bundesrat and The Federation Council [Russ. Сове́т Федера́ции is the upper house of the Federal Assembly of Russia, the parliament of the Russian Federation. Wikipedia] [The German Bundesrat (literally “Federal Council”) is a legislative body that represents the sixteen Länder (federated states) of Germany at the national level. Wikipedia]
The Russian legislators were invited to attend the 912th session of Bundesrat. This session had two details interesting to us. First, the meeting of German and Russian legislators was conducted in a warm and very friendly environment: the friendship group was received with applause. Second, this was the very session when Bundesrat approved the law regulating assistance to pregnant and anonymous births.
Thus, the meeting essentially provided the “hands-on” learning opportunity of advancing the “baby-box” legislative procedures in Germany. The session did touch on the research results of the German Youth Institute that irrefutably proved “baby-boxes” ineffective in lowering the infanticide rates. However, the facts were completely ignored by those present.
One cannot help but wonder about the connections between the members of the Russian “friendship group” and instances of “baby-box” installations in the corresponding regions of Russia. The official report on the Bundesrat website listed the following members of the Russian “friendship group:”
Valery Ponomarev (head of Russian delegation) – Senator of Kamchatka region;
Vladimir Plotnikov – Senator of Vladimir region at the time, current deputy of city of Volgograd;
Ury Rosliak – Senator of Moscow at the time, current auditor of Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation [Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation is the parliamentary body of the financial control in the Russian Federation. Wikipedia]
Alexander Savenkov – Senator of Vladimir region, current Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation;
Igor Shubin – Senator of Perm region;
Andrey Molchanov – Senator of Leningrad region, discontinued service at The Federation Council April 17, 2013;
Victor Kosourov – Senator of Novosibirsk region, current vice-president of Russian Foundation for Basic Research, RFBR;
Valery Vasilev – Senator of Ivanov region;
Valentin Mezhevich – Senator of Irkutsk region (2001 – 2013)
Let’s take a look at the regions of Russia where “baby-boxes” are already set up or in the process of being installed:
Kamchatka region: city of Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsk
Leningrad region: Kirishi
Vladimir region: city of Vladimir
Perm region: city of Perm
Ivanovo region: city of Ivanovo
Moscow region: Lubertsy
The regions of Russia where “baby-boxes” are being introduced clearly correspond to the locations of the “friendship group” members who participated in the gathering in Germany.
These Russian boys did great fighting off the bad guys, and so can we!
Conclusion
In summary: based on the cited above research, modern society now boosts a big demand for children and newborns as a commodity used in illegal and immoral ways. The demand is being met by the criminal organizations that form and supply a multi-trillion dollar black market.
Based on the facts of criminal activities with children, implied consequences of the introduction of “baby-boxes” in Russia raise many questions.
German sociologists ground their conclusions in massive statistical evidence on anonymous child relinquishment going back several decades. They clearly specify that “baby-boxes” have no impact on the numbers of infanticide; moreover, “baby-boxes” create a dangerous situation, making it impossible to track the children left in there.
This leads us to believe that people who promote anonymous “baby-boxes” – knowingly or unknowingly – perpetrate favorable conditions for criminal activities with children, using minors as highly profitable commodity. The condition of anonymity helps to conceal the child’s identity and makes it impossible to trace the child; it also proves to be an excellent cover for criminal businesses that have to do with children.
By Maxim Zhilenkov, Vitaliy Kanunnikov, Vladimir Chernyshev
Russian source:
https://regnum.ru/news/society/2141637.html
Link active as of February 19, 2017. RV