By Nikolay Starikov.
Donald Trump’s victory in the presidential elections in the United States is not a victory of one presidential candidate over another. It’s not even a victory of one offer to the citizens of the U.S. over the alternative offer of another party. It is a result of a fight within the American elite, as well as the world elite. The winner is one of the two sides, representing one of the ways of world affairs that is offered to humanity. Presidents of the United States are not elected – presidents of the United States are appointed.
Anyone who is seriously looking into American domestic politics will tell you that the United States don’t really have international politics on its own. They have domestic politics; the rest of the world is an attachment. Faith in the U.S. special mission and concentration of global trans-national corporations there indeed created a situation where domestic politics replaced all else. The recent elections were supposed to bless the decision of the world elite and therefore determine the way for humanity to follow. The decision was not made at the election sites, but in the quiet offices, at the meetings without “eyes and ears.”
Well, the elections passed. What’s at the end? Rather, what is left behind at the end? Left behind is a myth about Russian hackers. A very convenient myth for the defeated Democratic Party. The Party backed by trans-national corporations that advocate further onset of globalization and development of a financially-oriented economy. A very uncomfortable myth for victorious Trump. Trump is backed by the part of the world and American elite that advocate return of industry into the United States and the end of globalization as we currently know it.
Why is this Russian hackers myth so convenient for Trump’s opponents and so very uncomfortable for Trump? What did these mysterious Russian hackers do to make Hillary Clinton lose?
Before we talk about it, let us first bring up some facts. Facts about mysterious deaths that so closely surround the election field of Hillary Clinton.
John Ashe
The former President of the United Nations General Assembly, John Ashe was tangled in a corruption scandal. He was caught getting bribery from Chinese investors and on June 27, 2016 was supposed to testify in court on his connection to the Chinese businessman Ng Lap Seng. Seng was earlier involved in “Chinagate,” – a case on Bill Clinton’s campaign sponsorship and illegal funneling of funds to the Democratic National Committee. Considering Seng’s continuous relations with the Clintons, it is believed that Ashe could have revealed Hillary’s campaign financial fraud schemes and mechanics of bribery and falsification of the primaries. On June 23, 2016, three days before the trial, Ashe suddenly died – he had dropped the barbell on his throat while working out in his home. According to the police, it was an accident.
Seth Rich
A Democratic National Committee staffer, Director of voter expansion. He had access not only to e-mails, but also to the server where the documents publicized by WikiLeaks were stored. He is the supposed insider who provided the information on the Democratic Party’s dirty dealings. On July 10, 2016 he was killed with two shots in the back. Police treated the murder as an unsuccessful robbery attempt. However, no money or anything of value was taken.
Joe Montano
Former Chairman of the Democratic National Committee; he was also the Regional Director for vice presidential nominee Senator Tim Kaine. He was very well informed of the Party’s affairs; his death – right in the midst of the party caucus and the very next day after WikiLeaks publicized the pre-election communications – caused many to contemplate current events. The 47 year old politician died July 25, 2016. Cause of death: heart attack.
Victor Thorn
Journalist, the author of Crowning Clinton: Why Hillary Shouldn’t Be in the White House and the Hillary (And Bill): The Sex; The Drugs; The Murder trilogy. Not too long before his own death he blamed Clintons for the death of a young democrat Seth Rich, who was shot and killed June 10 near the White House after WikiLeaks publicized secret Democratic Party documents. Thorn was the first to connect the murder of Seth (out on the street, two shots in the back) to the Afro-American organization Black Lives Matter loyal to the Democratic Party. In his last articles Victor Thorn investigated the mysterious death of former President of the United Nations General Assembly John Ashe, who died while working out with his barbell, according to the official report. It happened the day John Ashe was supposed to testify against Clintons on their financial fraud case. In Thorn’s opinion, it was an assassination. Victor Thorn himself was shot in the head August 1, 2016. According to the police, it was suicide.
Shawn Lucas
On June 28, 2016 Lucas serves the Democratic National Committee (DNC) with a lawsuit alleging fraud in the elections, which gave Hillary Clinton an advantage over Bernie Sanders during primaries. He is mentioned as a defender in some sources and a leading lawyer in others, so it is not quite clear. He died August 2, 2016 in the bathroom of his home. The cause of death was not announced until November 1st: accidental adverse effects of combined medication: fentanyl, cyclobenzaprine, and mitragynine.
This chain of deaths is rather revealing. Hillary Clinton’s main opponent during Democratic primaries Bernie Sanders was pushed aside with the help of rather dirty tricks. Clinton’s electoral financial campaign was just as dirty. And there it started. First John Ashe, who was in the know of the financial schemes, dropped a barbell on his throat. Then Seth Rich was shot and killed: he was the most likely source of the WikiLeaks publication. After the WikiLeaks publication and right before the Democratic Party’s caucus, a heart attack takes the life of Joe Montano, one of the top executives of the Democratic Party. Investigative journalist Victor Thorn, who writes extensively on mysterious deaths around Clinton, is shot in the head next. Shawn Lucas helps serve the Democratic National Committee with a lawsuit alleging fraud in the primaries and takes a lethal medication overdose soon after.
Nevertheless, compromising information on the Clintons is publicized. However, in the aftermath of all of these deaths there is no one left now to point to the source of it. Killing off all of these people leads to a situation where anyone could be blamed for the leak, be it Russia or aliens, really. There are as many witnesses in this case now as the number of witnesses of the Battle on The Ice [fought in 1242 – RV]. This means the people can be offered any story as an explanation. And the story was offered: Russian hackers are to blame! There is a reason why no evidence is offered. There simply is no evidence, hence the “secret nature” of the American intelligence agencies “classified” reports on Russian hackers.
The “Russian hackers” story developed upon the elimination of a number of people puts Trump in a very uncomfortable position:
Acknowledge “Russian hackers” and admit oneself as someone who was brought to power – even partially – by the Kremlin.
Don’t acknowledge “Russian hackers” and admit the truth behind WikiLeaks publication, thereby setting a bomb to THE ENTIRE political system of the United States. Being the President of the United States, he cannot do it. Given the circumstances, Trump’s tactic is “neither yes nor no,” neither acknowledge nor deny. Hillary’s sudden death by the hands of some terrorists or in an airplane crash somewhere in Europe would definitely be the best way out for him. How it will all play out is not clear right now.
One thing is obvious: Trump’s opposing side wasn’t afraid to voice the idea that undermines the legitimacy of the American government and makes a laughing stock of the United States for the rest of the world. What kind of superpower nation can allow its presidential elections to be manipulated by a country like Russia with its “torn to pieces economy” [quoting Obama’s reference to Russia – RV]
Western media’s persistence at giving the “Russian hackers” a role in Trump’s victory undermines said victory and weakens the head of the American government. Doesn’t the price for increasing the degree of Russophobia [anti-Russian sentiment, fear of Russia – RV] in the world seem to be a bit too high here?
The American establishment always plays by the rules though. It would be quite advantageous for Trump to muck Clinton with dirt head to toe, completely debunk stories of “Russian hackers,” and to question the mysterious deaths. But that would kill the faith in fair presidential elections of people in the United States and the rest of the world, which is unacceptable to the forces behind the presidential candidates. And so Trump is not moving in the direction that is most advantageous for him personally, but destructive to the system.
The other side, however, is not afraid of such consequences. Why? Because the game is played at a level that is beyond any specific personas. So the intention here is not to weaken Trump personally, but to defeat him as a representative of the new vector. The aim is to prevent “the Trump side” from returning the industry back to the U.S. and starting the deflation of the giant financial bubble.
This is what’s at stake here. Globalists lost the battle fought in the closed elite circle and are now trying to undermine Trump’s attempts to do the job he was given the power to do.
In conclusion, one more time about Trump:
- He is not a revolutionary, not a fighter, but a candidate, chosen by the Republican Party. He is in the same line as the two Bushes and Ronald Reagan, who were not soft or loving towards Russia.
- The goal of the American world policy hasn’t changed: it is to maintain its global dominance. It’s just that getting there by other means [different from those of Obama’s – RV] opens a window of possibilities for Russia that was not there had the Obama vector continued.
- One of the features of Trump’s presidency will be its anti-China direction. In this respect, his friendly treatment of Russia on the background of his firmness towards China is nothing but an attempt to break the strong ties between Moscow and Pekin. This means that being charmed by the change of the U.S. policy vector is not only bad for us, it is mortally dangerous. For the coveted goal of the American politics is the war between Russia and China, World War I being a good example of how Anglo-Saxons set up the Russians and Germans, thereby destroying their two competitors.
Russian source:
https://nstarikov.ru/blog/73982
Link active as of January 30, 2017. RV